Mr. Beck has spent a career reinventing himself whenever it suited his advancement, and that it's rather risky to hitch the libertarian wagon to a mercurial entertainer with a penchant for radically changing his beliefs and a willingness to sucker his biggest fans.I think the people of this movement are very serious in their beliefs about what is wrong with this country and the world we live in (regardless of how based in fact or reality they may be), and that they, like every other American, has a right to express it, to gather together in celebration or protest of it, to worship however they see fit. If this is something that supposedly has come out of the Tea Party movement, then it is good to see that for once in its short history it has decided to stand for something rather than just against everything. No ideas, but I'll take the positivity at it's face value.
But I don't like hypocrites - and when you look at what this movement espouses, what it is supposed to stand for, what it hopes for our country, that's what you get - hypocrisy. You see the paradoxes, the strawmen, the breakdown in their flawed logic and arguments. You need more than just being upset at the way the world is to change the world. Tantrums and group therapy sessions don't help to make things better, to move us forward. This past weekend serves as a call to dig in in the trenches through the midterm elections, sponsored by the money that brought us the neoconservative movement (with all of it's hypocrisy), and broadcast without interruption, without question by an uninquisitive media organization. But who can blame Fox - it's their niche, they made it, and they give the people what they want how they want to hear it. Just like Hannity. Just like Coulter. Just like Palin. Just like Beck.
One must know the difference between when he has gone to Forum or gone to the Circus. It's when the line is blurred that we lose sight of truth and reality, and replace it with the stories of entertainers.






